On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:25:38AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
OTOH, risking this in 6.2 and having even less time to shake stuff
out in "real-life" is worse.
Not sure I get that? Should be in master sometime in summer, so enough
time to shake out issues?
Without wanting to say anything about the code quality, neither here nor
back then in the gtk3 case:
I completely disagree with that. How long was gtk3 in master before
being usable?
And people only test it on real-life late. Lesson learned.
And looking at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/6.2#6.2.0_release the
first alpha is not "in summer" anyway, but October. And if people only
test it in real-life with rc1 or even final...
That being merged for 6.2 will definitely mean I'll stick with 6.1 for
buster :)
Regards,
Rene
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.