Re: Running unit test by make <module>

Hi Bjoern,

OK, thanks for the info. Not a real problem. I have a headache mostly
because of the sd module, but now sd tests are moved to slowcheck, so
something improved here at least.
I guess if this fast tests (run by "make") are not usefull in general, in
long term they will be moved all to slowcheck anyway.

Best Regards,
Tamás

2017-11-12 21:03 GMT+01:00 Bjoern Michaelsen <
bjoern.michaelsen@libreoffice.org>:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:00:33PM +0100, Zolnai Tamás wrote:
> > Independently from the actual question, which is still unanswered,
>
> If the question is "why do we have this status quo?" the answer is
> "because it
> is result of some dozen discussions between developers (mostly on the
> ESC).".
> ~Every argument has already been made and I assume most are also preserved
> for
> eternity in the ESC minutes.
>
> > it's always a pleasure to see how "old" developers - living in a
> symbiosis
> > with the code - are worrying about the status quo.
>
> If you assume the status quo to be my personal best preference, I can
> assure you
> that is not the case. If you would dig through the six years of debate on
> ESC,
> you will even find that I was supporting tests to only be run on "make
> check"
> (to be consistent with autotools). That was not going to be due to this
> thing
> called "compromise".
>
> Im just warning that this is a bikeshedding topic that we already had an
> expensive compromise on -- and reopening this will at best require updating
> lots of docs and will at worst open yet another longwinded discussion --
> for little gain.
>
> Best,
>
> Bjoern