Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2017 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Anyway, I guess it's OK if I add a config option which avoids running unit
tests by simple make.
It does not make too much sense to me to run only some of the tests on a
module or on the full source. These tests are different only in the run
time, so I can't imagine when it's usefull to run only the fast tests.

Best Regards,
Tamás

2017-11-10 9:33 GMT+01:00 Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk>:

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:03:18AM +0100, Zolnai Tamás <
zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com> wrote:
     make <module>.build

Great, but then what is simple make for?

Similar to plain 'make' (which runs a subset of all tests: unit and
slowchecks, but not subsequentchecks), 'make <module>' also runs only a
subset of tests (unitchecks, but not slowchecks or subsequentchecks).

(Yes, this just describes the situation, I don't know the reasoning
behind this behavior.)

Regards,

Miklos

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.