" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?]

Miklos Vajna <vmiklos -AT- collabora.co.uk>
Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:04:53 +0200

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:13:07PM +0200, Lars Callenbach <lcallenbach@web.de> wrote:

is it possible to have leave the parameter empty in Calc function if
the input is of type "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" in the IDL-file?


What is the context, calling this function from Basic? I think Basic
provides "optional" parameters when the last X parameter of a function
is of type Any. In that case you're allowed to omit the parameter, and
the Basic interpreter will synthesize empty Any values for those
parameters.

I believe the same doesn't work for sequences.

Regards,

Miklos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Context

no parameter values for "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?] · Lars Callenbach
- Re: no parameter values for "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?] · Miklos Vajna
  - Re: no parameter values for "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?] · Lars Callenbach

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.