" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?]

Lars Callenbach <lcallenbach -AT- web.de>
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 20:13:07 +0200

Hi all,

is it possible to have leave the parameter empty in Calc function if
the input is of type "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" in the IDL-file?

For scalar parameters of the type "[in] any" it is possible to use the
"hasValue()" method to analyse whether a parameter value is provided by
the user for the function call. It is possible in Calc to leave the
parameter position empty. 

Is there any similar method for array like parameters of type "[in]
sequence<sequence<any > >"? Currently I must provide a reference (or
value) in my function calls if the input is of type "[in]
sequence<sequence<any > >" - but I would like to use default values and
to leave the parameter position empty.  
 

Kind regards,
   Lars

Context

no parameter values for "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?] · Lars Callenbach
- Re: no parameter values for "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?] · Miklos Vajna
  - Re: no parameter values for "[in] sequence<sequence<any > >" [equivalent for hasValue() for "[in] any"?] · Lars Callenbach

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.