Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2017 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Eike,

On 06/16/2017 12:55 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Muhammet,

On Friday, 2017-06-16 12:49:22 +0300, Muhammet Kara wrote:

RemoveEntry(SvTreeListEntry* pEntry) //Remove with children
Isn't that what

     bool Remove( const SvTreeListEntry* pEntry );

does?
Seems so. This is the method I mentioned in the previous post. It is a member of the SvTreeList class, and can be accessed after calling GetModel() on an SvTreeListBox object, and using the returned pointer to the related SvTreeList object. This method is called separately for each child in the RemoveSelected() method, so I assumed it might leave some (all?) children orphan.

RemoveSingleEntry(SvTreeListEntry* pEntry) //Don't check for children
You'd likely end up with orphans then.
Yep. It should be called only when you are sure that there is no children. I want to use it that way at least (to get rid of extra call to HasChildren()). And I will explain this in its comment. Do you think we shouldn't have such a method because it can be misused?

   Eike

Cheers,
Muhammet

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.