Hi Eike,
On 06/16/2017 12:55 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Muhammet,
On Friday, 2017-06-16 12:49:22 +0300, Muhammet Kara wrote:
RemoveEntry(SvTreeListEntry* pEntry) //Remove with children
Isn't that what
bool Remove( const SvTreeListEntry* pEntry );
does?
Seems so. This is the method I mentioned in the previous post. It is a
member of the SvTreeList class, and can be accessed after calling
GetModel() on an SvTreeListBox object, and using the returned pointer to
the related SvTreeList object. This method is called separately for each
child in the RemoveSelected() method, so I assumed it might leave some
(all?) children orphan.
RemoveSingleEntry(SvTreeListEntry* pEntry) //Don't check for children
You'd likely end up with orphans then.
Yep. It should be called only when you are sure that there is no
children. I want to use it that way at least (to get rid of extra call
to HasChildren()). And I will explain this in its comment. Do you think
we shouldn't have such a method because it can be misused?
Eike
Cheers,
Muhammet
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.