Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On 23 Nov 2016, at 14:53, Zolnai Tamás <zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Eike,

I had no choice. You've made a decision and it seems I have to live
with the consequences.
So please don't insult me with saying 'thank you’.

Hi Tamás

Just to be sure, you are NOT alone in here….I respect that API incompatibility needs to be 
carefully considered, but we also need to have windows for doing such things.

In my mind API changes should be forbidden in X.y.<foo> versions, but allowed in 5.y.0 versions. 
The reason being if we make new functionality, the API needs to be enhanced.

Having said that, I understand that we need to make sure “old” extensions continue to work, which 
translates to (in my understanding), that “only expand, do not change in the middle” of structures”.

I am all for enhancements (especially ones I can use :-) )

Please consider joining our call this thursday berlin time 16:00 (UTC 15:00 I think), if you need 
help let me know.

rgds
jan I.



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.