On 23 Nov 2016, at 14:53, Zolnai Tamás <zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Eike,
I had no choice. You've made a decision and it seems I have to live
with the consequences.
So please don't insult me with saying 'thank you’.
Hi Tamás
Just to be sure, you are NOT alone in here….I respect that API incompatibility needs to be
carefully considered, but we also need to have windows for doing such things.
In my mind API changes should be forbidden in X.y.<foo> versions, but allowed in 5.y.0 versions.
The reason being if we make new functionality, the API needs to be enhanced.
Having said that, I understand that we need to make sure “old” extensions continue to work, which
translates to (in my understanding), that “only expand, do not change in the middle” of structures”.
I am all for enhancements (especially ones I can use :-) )
Please consider joining our call this thursday berlin time 16:00 (UTC 15:00 I think), if you need
help let me know.
rgds
jan I.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.