Coding style using shared_ptr – The Document Foundation Mailing List Archives

Aptitude Testing Team <aptitude -AT- btconnect.com>

Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:33:35 +0100

We have an inconsistency with the coding style in our shared_ptr typedefs cd core/include; grep -R "typedef std::shared_ptr" Shows (for "std::shared_ptr<Foo>") we have "FooPtr" or "FooRef" or "PFoo" Should we standardise this? FooPtr is my preference. In addition we also have 3 typedef's for unique_ptr's. In my opinion, I think these should be removed to avoid confusion Any thoughts?

Context

Coding style using shared_ptr · Aptitude Testing Team

Re: Coding style using shared_ptr · Stephan Bergmann
- Re: Coding style using shared_ptr · Tor Lillqvist

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.