Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index





Along with that, we could then kill the "make build-nocheck" travesty and have
'make' and 'make build' each do the same regardless of if its on toplevel and
in a module? Right?  Please?

When we talk about simplifying, it would be good if
"make" used pr default the same configuration as our release build on the platform.

Or at the very least have a "make release". 

Right now if people change e.g. 5.1 to make a local change and do a build they end up with a very 
different image, and finding the release configurations is not that easy.

rgds
jan I.


Best,

Bjoern
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.