On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> wrote:
I don't claim Jenkins is a good infrastructure for this. (But I don't want
to start any discussion about that. Just wanted to point out that adding
timeouts to test code is the wrong solution to the underlying problem of
having reliable build bots.)
not 'to the test code'.. to wrap around the execution of tests.
I fail to see what is wrong with that.
2/ the linux debug build, once a week also rebuild the doc.. which
takes a long time.. so I had to bump that global level deadlock to the
max time a full build + build the doc and upload it can take... which
make the deadlock kick in the 5-6 hours range... not great.
A single, fixed timeout, independent of the kind of build you're doing,
indeed doesn't look very useful.
notwithstanding the generate doc case... if you have a trick to figure
out in advance how long an incremental build will take.. please let me
know :-)
the conservative tiemout is there to limit the damage.. but it is
indeed suboptimal. thankfully we do not have _that_ many hangs
Context
- Re: linux dbgutil tinderbox stuck -> backtrace (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.