Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I understand, but the situation with Firebird seems less than ideal, at least in terms of Windows 
builds at any rate. 

Are the tests really that much slower? Obviously we are relying on having a Java installation to 
test out Base. 

Can we isolate those things that we can test on sqlite to sqlite, and any other things to HSQLDB2 
or H2? If/when sqlite or some other more appropriate embedded database comes along, then we can 
consider switching. 

Oh, and I’m not sure if this brings much to the table, but I wonder if we can simulate joins. After 
all, to get a right join you just swap tables, and you can actually simulate a full outer join with 
just a combination of other joins. 

Chris

On 8 Mar 2016, at 2:11 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:06:07AM +1100, Chris Sherlock wrote:
Is HSQLDB out of the question?

HSQLDB2 and H2 are good choices if we decide to stay with a Java-based
one (which brings performance problems because of the slowness of
crossing the C++-to-Java barrier).

On 7 Mar 2016, at 11:32 PM, Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com> wrote:



On 2016/03/07 2:11 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:23:53AM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
A few examples of how SQLite differs from the SQL standard (be it de facto
or de jure standard) in quite deep, fundamental ways:

* lack of other datatypes than "integer", "real" (float), "string of characaters"
  and "string of bytes": the basic ones are dates, times, timestamps.

* lack of datatype checking; one can insert "noel" in a column of
  type "integer"

* type attached to value, not to column


That is true, but we could implement basic checking of our own on top of that, or just ignore 
it, and rely on the user getting it right most of the time (which they normally do). And when 
they don't, it is a rather soft failure mode in SQLite.



Also annoying, but can be worked around:

Yeah, that's what I mean - there are other issues, but they can be worked around.

I suppose we can just keep limping along with our current state of affairs, it's not like Base 
is that widely used, or particularly vital to our future.

But it would be nice to upgrade to something a little more modern, and Firebird is not really 
working out for us, and what other options do we really have?

At least SQLite is widely used and moving forward at a reasonable rate.

Regards, Noel.

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.