On 4 Jan 2016, at 4:23 PM, Mark Hung <marklh9@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Chris,
As recently I'm working on SvParser and HTMLParser,
There is BOM detection is in SvParser::GetNextChar().
A quick look at eehtml, EditHTMLParser:: <>EditHTMLParser seems relevant.
Best regards.
2016-01-04 12:02 GMT+08:00 Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79@gmail.com
<mailto:chris.sherlock79@gmail.com>>:
Hey guys,
Probably nobody saw this because of the time of year (Happy New Year, incidentally!!!).
Just a quick ping to the list to see if anyone can give me some pointers.
Chris
On 30 Dec 2015, at 12:15 PM, Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79@gmail.com
<mailto:chris.sherlock79@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi guys,
In bug 95217 - https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95217
<https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95217> - Persian test in a webpage encoded
as UTF-8 is corrupting.
If I take the webpage and save to an HTML file encoded as UTF8, then there are no problems and
the Persian text comes through fine. However, when connecting to a webserver directly, the HTTP
header correctly gives the content type as utf8.
I did a test using Charles Proxy with its SSL interception feature turned on and pointed Safari
to https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=119818
<https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=119818>
The following headers are gathered:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.2.1
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:41:30 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; name="text.html"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 982
Connection: keep-alive
X-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
Content-disposition: inline; filename="text.html"
X-content-type-options: nosniff
Some warnings are spat out that it editeng's eehtml can't detect the encoding. I initially
thought it was looking for a BOM, which makes no sense for a webpage, but that's wrong. Instead,
for some reason the headers don't seem to be processed and the HTML parser is falling back to
ISO-8859-1 and not UTF8 as the character encoding.
We seem to use Neon to make the GET request to the webserver. A few observations:
1. We detect a server OK response as an error
2. (Probably more to the point) I believe PROPFIND is being used, but actually even though the
function being used indicates a PROPFIND verb is used a GET is used as is normal but the headers
aren't being stored. This ,Evans that when the parser looks for the headers to find the encoding
it's not finding anything, resulting in a fallback to ISO-8859-1.
One easy thing (doesn't solve the root issue) is that wouldn't it be a better idea to fallback
to UTF8 and not ISO-8859-1, given ISO-8859-1 is really just a subset of UTF-8?
Any pointers on how to get to the bottom of this would be appreciated, I'm honestly not up on
webdav or Neon.
Chris Sherlock
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org <mailto:LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org>
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice>
--
Mark Hung
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.