Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?

David Tardon <dtardon -AT- redhat.com>
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:20:30 +0100

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:33:47AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:00:16AM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:

Hi Wols,

On Wednesday, 2015-11-11 19:09:39 +0000, Wols Lists wrote:

It's getting more wordy but INSUFFICIENT DATA AVAILABLE is a bit more
neutral.


<nitpick>
insufficient data can not be available
</nitpick>


Nitpick, but true none the less: if this is really what you guys want to do, it
should be DATA AVAILABLE INSUFFICIENT instead -- or DATA PROVIDED INSUFFICIENT.


And how exactly this differs from plain "INSUFFICIENT DATA"? Are there
any other data relevant to the bug than those PROVIDED by the reporter /
triagers (i.e., AVAILABLE in the bug)?

D.

Context

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? (continued)
- Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Joel Madero
  - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Eike Rathke
    - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Joel Madero
      - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Norbert Thiebaud
    - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Bjoern Michaelsen
      - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Joel Madero
      - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Eike Rathke
        
        Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Wols Lists
        
        Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Eike Rathke
        
        Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Bjoern Michaelsen
        Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · David Tardon
  - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Bjoern Michaelsen
- (message not available)
  - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Joel Madero
    - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Tommy
      - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Hung Mark
      - Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs? · Michael Stahl

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.