Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can
> > not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one
> > time crash and no stack trace, no exact steps to reproduce, even if the
> > reporter was or would be willing to provide ... all cases where
> > WORKSFORME sounds a bit odd and lax (which is a valid resolution if the
> > given steps do not lead to the described failure), but ABANDONED
> > wouldn't fit either, IMHO..
> True - I'm happy with either of them. I'm not so sure this will tame the
> rude users from going on rants about having to provide sufficient
> information but it's a start :)

I do not care either about the exact wording... the only point I'm
looking to improve upon is that
'Works for me' is a cop-out and is bound to put the recipient in a bad
mood even a willing and cooperative reporter.
I'd like wording that reflect that the bug is not just 'ignored' or
the report dismissed, but that it cannot be acted upon, due to
a lack of follow up by the reporter or other in position to reproduce,
or due to an apparent
impossibility to reproduce coupled with a lack of exploitable data
from the original report.

Yes it won't prevent some of the outburst we see on occasion, but at
least it won't feed the beast
either.

Norbert