On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
wrote:
OSL provides atomic helpers (osl_atomic_xxx) in the form of a GNU builtin
(where available) or a platform-specific implementation.
Any reason for not using modern std::atomic (besides possible lack of
volunteers) ?
As a transitional phase, we can maintain the same interface but with
std:atomic as the implementation.
Thoughts?
osl atomic are c interface, used in c-source...
Thanks. Is there equivalent used in C++ ? (osl atomics only work for
sal_Int32 values, which is another potential issue for 64-bit portability.)
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.