On 09/26/2015 06:14 PM, Michaël Lefèvre wrote:
2. we could minimized the results by removing check on qa
sub-directories, which are supposed to be the place for unit tests.
Any specific reason to avoid checking the test code? It is code like
all the other code too, with bugs and shortcomings and all.
By the way, thank you for bringing this idea to reality.
Actually, my point is if we could bring this warning close to 0, the
actually crash-test and coverity status !
But note that the cppcheck results have what looks like a rather high
false positive rate (at least, that has always been my impression
whenever I bothered to look at the generated data).
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.