On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> wrote:
we shouldn't maintain our own make fork but use the upstream release if
possible; the Win32 make binary you can download from
dev-www.libreoffice.org was built from the upstream git repo.
I completely agree... the reason I created that to start with is
because I needed some more useful debug trace on invocation of $(call
to debug things when we where working a lot on gnumake.... I tried to
upstream these (quite small) patches.. but these were silently ignored
upstream...
so I did and used my own fork to be able to use this...
of course thee are some advantages to having this repo, we can do some
experiments and add fixes to bugs we have (like the one you found).
yes, and prepare patch for upstream, including rebasing them while
upstream is sitting on them..
Note: I do _not_ use that repo to build make for the slave bot...
Norbert
Context
- Re: Make.exe for Cygwin (continued)
Re: Make.exe for Cygwin · Ashod Nakashian
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.