Re: Package building reduces the lifetime of the SSD drives

Does we still use [1] for OS X tinderboxes?

[1]
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/tree/mac_dailies/daily_make

2015-02-23 22:27 GMT+01:00 Robert Antoni Buj i Gelonch <robert.buj@gmail.com
> :

> [1] is still in use. Might we use WORKDIR instead of TMPDIR? 5.7GB
> is approximately the space required for WORKDIR in OS X.
>
> [1]
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/tree/mac_dailies/daily_make
>
> 2015-02-23 14:17 GMT+01:00 Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Robert Antoni Buj i Gelonch
> > <robert.buj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > There are a lot of copy operations before to package LO. I propose you
> > copy
> > > the files to package into a temporary ramdisk.
> >
> > I take it we're talking about 'instdir' which holds the to-be-packaged
> > files, then wouldn't it be easier to just hardlink to them?
> >
> > There is already a configure flag to do just that:
> > --enable-hardlink-deliver
> >
> > It should do what you want, but if it doesn't, then patches are welcome!
>
>
>
> --
> http://about.me/rbuj



-- 
http://about.me/rbuj