On 02/22/2015 05:42 PM, julien2412 [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] wrote:
Noticing by chance http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=a94390d20c50125e25e29431ca15ca2ca6683d17, I noticed with Opengrok that there were some similar cases, see http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=%22singleton+name%22&project=core&defs=&refs=&path=&hist= eg: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/framework/util/fwk.component#33 Should we clean these too or we can't generalize this rule?
No, a94390d20c50125e25e29431ca15ca2ca6683d17 is about cases where the name of a UNOIDL singleton (cf. the .idl files in offapi) is erroneously also used for a service declaration in a .component file. In general, in implementation described in a .component file can list an arbitrary number of services and singletons. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Singleton-is-never-a-service-tp4141020p4141072.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.