Singleton is never a service?

Hello, Noticing by chance http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=a94390d20c50125e25e29431ca15ca2ca6683d17, I noticed with Opengrok that there were some similar cases, see http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=%22singleton+name%22&project=core&defs=&refs=&path=&hist= eg: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/framework/util/fwk.component#33 Should we clean these too or we can't generalize this rule? Julien -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Singleton-is-never-a-service-tp4141020.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.

Context