On 18/10/14 03:23, nicholas ferguson wrote:
I will also add...that LibreOffice's approach to a complicated build... has
legs and could be marketed as a buid system for complicated apps, that are
cross platform. Especially if it removes cygwin from its equation.
How close is this to lilypond's GUB? Although I think that is more aimed
at a universal binary for linux distros. Lilypond also, though, is a big
complicated program that runs on linux and windows.
Cheers,
Wol
Context
- RE: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16 (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.