why isn't this wiki page referenced in the readme? Isn't that wiki a
page for develpers. What kind of developer in your world, doesn't
build a debug version, first?
We used to recommend a debug version AFAIR, but the build tree on Linux with debuginfo is
30Gb small - and
with debug symbols it takes forages to link. Often it's more feasible to re-build just a
single module with debuginfo.
[nicholas ferguson]
[nicholas ferguson]
I guess its english.
Recommending a debug build...is saying on wiki how to put --enable-dbgutil into the autogen.input
... and then solving that wacky issue with boost.
why do you think I was asking to download a debug version. of 30G...
Where is it mentioned how not to keep downloading the tar files? for
3rd party dependencies. That alone is a HUGE COST OF ENTRY...to
discover how to turn that off.
The automatic download saves manually downloading 70 or so individual dependencies; you can
argue that it sucks (and it does) - but doing that manually sucks more =)
A build for a newcomer has to be run three or four times? Why should the tar files get downloaded
four times? How does a newcomer turn it off after the first download? Tor had to explain that to
me.
This is another HIGH COST OF ENTRY. I ask questions and I get answer that don't fit my questions.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.