On 17/09/14 14:07, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Eike Rathke píše v St 17. 09. 2014 v 12:50 +0200:
Also, if bug IDs are present in the revert summary, shouldn't the
corresponding bugs be set to REOPENED if they were already resolved or
closed?
I'd prefer not to do it, similarly as we don't close the bugs
automagically when the commit has the bug id.
Sometimes there are partial reverts, sometimes there are 'Related'
commits that can be not crucial for the bug itself.
even better, sometimes the actual fix is reverted and some other commit
actually fixed the bug already in a "better" way :) the revert's commit
message should indicate this of course.
The comment will go to the bug, so I'd prefer to leave the decision
whether to re-open or not up to the QA guys, probably?
yes that's enough.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.