Re: C++11 – The Document Foundation Mailing List Archives

Re: C++11

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>

Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:06:08 +0200

...oh, and one important thing I forgot to mention: For the URE

interface, it is probably best to stay with C++03 for now (to keep

requirements laxer for 3rd party extension authors, and e.g. not force

extensions). In other words, all the include files that end up copied

to the SDK's include/ directory still need to be compileable by a

non-C++11 compiler.

Stephan

Context

C++11 · Stephan Bergmann

bibisect baseline (was: C++11) · Bjoern Michaelsen
Re: C++11 · Jan-Marek Glogowski
- Re: C++11 · Stephan Bergmann
Re: C++11 · Stephan Bergmann
- Re: C++11 · Lubos Lunak
  - Re: C++11 · Bjoern Michaelsen

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.