On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
ConfirmedRegression
Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression.
why do we need this, given that we have a "regression" keyword? this is
a pointless alias... developers don't search for it, the ESC bug-stats
script doesn't know about it... fortunately currently only 2 bugs have it.
Moving to not in use - agreed regression keyword is sufficient.
AFAIK the only reason we use 'regression' in the keyword field instead
of the whiteboard is that FDO happens to have 'regression' set as a
keyword. To simplify our learning curve for QA, we should make a push
for consistency. (we can make a decision here after bugzilla
migration)
--R
--
Robinson Tryon
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
Senior QA Bug Wrangler
The Document Foundation
qubit@libreoffice.org
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.