Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

On 06/17/2014 02:46 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 16/06/14 23:39, Joel Madero wrote:
> > *Status*     *Question*
> > complextest  Is this useful? If so – when should we use it?
> > unoapitest   We have “uno” is that sufficient?
> these two are very similar, maybe we could combine them as junittest?
Hm - Bjoern seemed to like them separate. For now we'll keep separate
but I'll make a note of maybe combining.
> although actually i'd like to limit "dataloss" to ODF documents only,
> where this really is not supposed to happen - if it's some other format
> it's more like a missing feature
We'll discuss on call tomorrow.
> .
> > experimentalEnabled  Is this useful?
> a little... it lets us de-prioritize bugs that happen in features that
> are known to be broken anyway.
+1
> > odf  Suggestion to change to “extension:ODF” – see previous email
> this has nothing to do with extensions, but with file formats; in
> particular ODF which is the default format and the one where we have to
> care the most about interoperability issues with other office suites
> (and also older versions of LO), so a short and sweet keyword is really
> needed.
Yes I said the wrong word - maybe filter:ODT, filter:DOCX, filter:RTF is
best.
> > odf_validation       Who uses this? How do we know it's “validation” is it
> > for developers only?
> people have filed bugs about LO producing ODF documents that ODF
> validators find objectionable.
+1
> i've got questions too:
>
> > ConfirmedRegression
> >
> > Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression.
> why do we need this, given that we have a "regression" keyword?  this is
> a pointless alias... developers don't search for it, the ESC bug-stats
> script doesn't know about it... fortunately currently only 2 bugs have it.
Moving to not in use - agreed regression keyword is sufficient.


Best,
Joel