What would be interesting to see is a bench mark in terms of compilation
times and evaluate if its really worth changing the ABI and breaking
compatability.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
wrote:
On 06/12/2014 08:30 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
I am not trying to hijack this thread, but I am part of another project
where we build for windows on linux boxes. Have you guys considered
looking into building for windows on Linux?
We have support for mingw cross-compilation in the build system, but that
effort never really went anywhere fully fruitful AFAICT (and would imply a
different ABI, i.e., incompatibility of---native code, at
least---extensions).
Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
--
Jonathan Aquilina
Context
- Re: Quantifying the time overhead of Cygwin make (continued)
Re: Quantifying the time overhead of Cygwin make · Norbert Thiebaud
Re: Quantifying the time overhead of Cygwin make · Michael Stahl
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.