Re: Questions about getCppuType

I noticed that if I did this:
diff --git a/cppu/qa/test_unotype.cxx b/cppu/qa/test_unotype.cxx
index bbea200..f0d2b03 100644
--- a/cppu/qa/test_unotype.cxx
+++ b/cppu/qa/test_unotype.cxx
@@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ void Test::testUnoType() {
 void Test::testGetTypeFavourUnsigned() {
     CPPUNIT_ASSERT(typeid(::sal_Unicode) == typeid(::sal_uInt16));
     CPPUNIT_ASSERT(
-        ::getCppuType(static_cast< ::sal_Unicode * >(0)) ==
-        ::getCppuType(static_cast< ::sal_uInt16 * >(0)));
+        cppu::UnoType<cppu::UnoCharType>::get() ==
+        cppu::UnoType<cppu::UnoUnsignedShortType>::get() );

make cppu gives this:
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/cppu/qa/test_unotype.cxx:275:(anonymous
namespace)::Test::testGetTypeFavourUnsigned
assertion failed
- Expression: cppu::UnoType<cppu::UnoCharType>::get() ==
cppu::UnoType<cppu::UnoUnsignedShortType>::get()

test_unotype.cxx:275:Assertion
Test name: (anonymous namespace)::Test::testGetTypeFavourUnsigned
assertion failed
- Expression: cppu::UnoType<cppu::UnoCharType>::get() ==
cppu::UnoType<cppu::UnoUnsignedShortType>::get()

Failures !!!
Run: 3   Failure total: 1   Failures: 1   Errors: 0

I don't understand why it's failing in this case.
Any idea?

Also, I noticed this:
    273     CPPUNIT_ASSERT(
    274         ::getCppuType(static_cast< ::sal_Unicode * >(0)) ==
    275         ::getCppuType(static_cast< ::sal_uInt16 * >(0)));


    551     CPPUNIT_ASSERT(
    552         ::getCppuType< ::sal_Unicode >() == ::getCppuType<
::sal_uInt16 >());
How could the line 552 be converted to remove getCppuType? (compared with
first case)

Julien



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Questions-about-getCppuType-tp4106361p4109104.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.