Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hello,

Taking a look again at fdo#42371 (see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42371), I wonder if
SwSortedObjs  could be implemented with a set instead of the vector.
The goal would be to sort automatically the container and insert/remove more
easily+quickly.

Of course, the pb is std::set doesn't have [] operator and needs an iterator
+ advance (or perhaps missed an easy way?) However, leafing through the use
of SwSortedObjs (used by other classes) it seems that [] is mainly
(exclusively?) used in loops.
So to make things easier to migrate (if it worths it of course! :-)), what
about this 3 steps process:
1) Adding an iterator in  SwSortedObjs (quick)
2) use iterator in loops (must be long)
3) replace vector by set (perhaps not too quick if tuning is needed)
?

Any idea?

Julien




--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-SwSortedObjs-tp4102571.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.