Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:33:24AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
      I'm not that clear on what you suggest. I assume you are not suggesting
doubling the number of Linux packages to 4x per architecture: .deb
+ .rpm (old) and .deb + .rpm (new) - and then more fooling in the
downloader etc. ? (that doesn't sound sensible for a minority platform -
with x86_64 -> 8x package archives.

No, I dont want to suggest to get even more packages. Rather to build the core
(non-kde/gtk-stuff) of LibreOffice on the 'old' baseline, and then have a
chroot on that same machine with a newer baseline, and build just the kde/gtk
parts against that baseline and the already partial build tree we have from the
build on the old baseline. So you would end up with one set of .rpm/.debs,
where the core of it runs anywhere, while the gtk/kde bits require something
halfway recent.

But in the end its probably not worth it at all, if we just make sure distros
can be very quick with their packages, so that upstream binaries are just used
as a 'proof it build'. ;)

Best,

Bjoern

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.