Just my 2 cents...
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com> wrote:
1.
In general, it would be sad to just drop completely functionality
because someone can get confused...
maybe altering the name of this (and other format in similar
situation) and their position in the list
to clearly mark them as 'obsolete/legacy/historical' etc... ?
2. Change one of these names to be consistent:
ODF Text Document (odt)
OpenDocument Text (Flat XML) (fodt)
Either: OpenDocument Text (odt) or Flat ODF Text Document (fodt)
I personally prefer the later.
3. Change "Text Encoded (.txt)" to "Text (Choose Encoding) (.txt) or
"Text - Choose Encoding (.txt)"
The 2nd is clearer to me, but I can see where that is debatable... in
any case, yes, 2nd and 3rd are better than the original.
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.