On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:27 AM, V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu> wrote:
Giving this a bump.
So Lubos, you've taken for review everything looking good? Norbert?
Sure would like to see this make the 4.0.5 RC2 cut, if ready it is worth the
extra effort.
None the less, I really hope we can give Boris the welcome he deserves,
including any assistance he needs on navigating CodeReview and packaging of
patches. He may be new to LO but has a proven track record with
NSAccessibility for OSX.
OK so
1/ Yes Boris is doing a good job, and I for one does not hold is 'new'
status against him at all, quite the contrary, I'm very pleased that
he decided to tackle some of these Accessibility issues.
I actually worked with him last week-end to get his patch committed.
2/ I am no Accessibility expert, heck not even an amateur on the
topic. The reason I have not acted here is that
the requirement is to push a patch that lubos cherry picked, which is
not 'trivial' to me, hence I don't feel competent to claim it is OK.
3/ there are enough approval to get it through 4-0 and 4-1, but
getting things in a RC branch hours prior tagging is another matter.
I certainly have nothing against that particular patch, and I'll
gladly defer to the opinion of people more informed than me on the
topic.
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.