On 5 August 2013 12:26, Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yoshida@suse.de> wrote:
In short, these two take two different code paths. The HTML export one
goes through an internal, C++ export filter (I believe), whereas the XHTML
export one goes through a XSLT based export path, which is super slow and
is not scalable.
In the future we should probably organize this area, and just have one
C++-based export filter that always exports XHTML. But we are not there
yet.
Korei, thanks by information.
But I was not referring (yet) to code, sorry for I haven't been clearer.
But I'd like to know why we have two options to, apparently, do the same
thing.
So, I'm asking why we have "Save as Document HTML" option? Is it intended
to have an HTML option as a "continuing edit" format?
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.