Re: No non-incremental non-pch windows tinderbox?

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Markus Mohrhard
<markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2013/7/16 Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz>:
> >  Hello,
> >
> >  it seems to me that right now we have no windows tinderbox that would build
> > the normal usual way (no pch, make clean first) [*]. As there are
> > occassionally bugs that do not show immediately in fast builds (such as
> > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4863 that got cherry-picked to libreoffice-4-1
> > a couple of hours ago), can we please agree on having one tindebox that would
> > do a normal build?
> >
> > [*] I'm not actually sure about Win-x86_38, it
> > has --disable-dependency-tracking in configure flags which suggests it does
> > make clean, but I do not see that phase in the full log.
>
> Win-x86_38 produces clean builds with pch. I think the cleaning step
> is done by tb and might just not show up in the logs.

Yes, I will put on my todo list to improve the reporting to indicate
such thing somehow, so that
who is operating the box and what pertinent operational parameter are
in use be visible in the header section of the log

Norbert