Hi,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:11:29PM +0200, John Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> wrote:
i'm afraid that right now we have so many obvious large gaps in test
coverage that using test coverage tools is a bit premature. perhaps one
run per release cycle would be informative for general trends but likely
few developers have the time to look at the result in detail anyway (i
don't).
Yes, of course this is what i meant to say.
;)
I just filed an EasyHack on this:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Re: build with code coverage · Miklos Vajna
Re: build with code coverage · bfo
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.