On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 11:25 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi, On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:18:06PM +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 20:20 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: ...The firebird specific libraries (fb builds its own versions libicuuc/libicudata/etc.) are currently in install/program/firebird/libreally? it bundles its own ICU? argh... can you teach it to use the LO's ICU instead? no reason why we'd need to ship 2 sets of ICU libraries.... As I was writing in the wiki: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=Development/Base/FirebirdSQL#Compilation We may hit some problems if we use LO's or systems ICU with the table indexes. I think the safest would actually be to use always FB's internal ICU copy but other possible approaches are possible in order to face this problem.I think you are thinking too short. Nnote that most distros will simply build with system-firebird. (and whatever THAT one is built against - looks like that it's *external* ICU here: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libfbembed2.5)
... That's why in the initial discussions we were already talking about removing the possibility of "system-firebird" and always using an internal compilation: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=Development/Base/FirebirdSQL#Compilation http://firebird.1100200.n4.nabble.com/Firebird-as-backend-in-LibreOffice-td4633330.html Of course, maybe other options that I've not taken into account are better. Br. -- Andres Gomez Computer Science Engineer mailto:agomez@igalia.com http://blogs.igalia.com/agomez/category/igaliacom/ IGALIA, S.L. http://www.igalia.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part