Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 2013-06-23 17:24, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Thanks!  The zip'd packaging is fine for testing, have grabbed a copy.

Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for starters
that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set to major/minor
49.0, or J2SE 5.  Is that a javac compatibility mode setting of some sort?

Useful none the less, but might not see interesting changes until able to
assess java compiled to Java 7 bytecode, i.e. major/minor 51.0.  Just hope
there is not a lot of code refactoring to get to that point.


Changing the version number of the Java bytecode will have absolutely no impact on your problem because the Java-VM happily loads bytecode versions all the way back to Java1.0 i.e. it has pretty much perfect backwards compatibility in that respect.

You are more likely to be seeing some kind of subtle change in timing, or a small but significant change in how some part of the Java runtime behaves.

You could try doing a manual binary search through the Java runtime versions, that might help narrow it down.



Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.