Re: Doubt about OpenSymbol and Math

Hi,

Olivier Hallot schrieb:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Em 04-06-2013 06:43, Noel Grandin escreveu:
>
> > I think the question that Marcos is asking is a little different.
> >
> > Math typography is slightly weird in that people like to invent their
> > own symbols, and symbols are often very particular to quite a small
> > group of mathematicians.
> > Lots of the more common symbols have local variants that are only used
> > within a specific nation, or within a grouping of academic institutions.
> > So no font is ever going to be able to capture more than the most widely
> > used variants of the symbols.
> >
> > So what I think he wants is the ability to define custom new shapes at
> > runtime and add them to some kind of gallery, and to be able to embed
> > them into a document.
>
> Hi Noel
>
> This is what I suspect STIX(1) fonts are about: provide to scientific
> community a font that covers all/most of the math/science demands. You
> will notice that STIX fonts has a quite hefty support organizations.
>
> So basically, given that STIX has all the symbols, why do we need
> OpenSymbol and the work to fill the gaps?

Besides STIX also the MathJax-fonts are suitable. I got the package from 
https://mdn.mozillademos.org/files/3677/MathML-fonts.zip, but they seem 
to be in some Linux distro as well.

Kind regards
Regina