Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote

...
This leaves us with completely unmaintainable ("where do I need to lock 
SolarMutex?"---"nobody knows for sure") and broken (cf. 
SolarMutexReleaser) code.
...


Should/can "SolarMutex" be removed?
If yes, I suppose it's not simple and perhaps there's a lot of work ahead
(so for 4.2 version?) but would there be anything (eg tedious/long but easy
to do) which could be done as a prerequisite?

Julien



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/SolarMutex-please-educate-me-tp4055778p4055959.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.