Re: What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source?

Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard -AT- googlemail.com>
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:22:51 +0200

2013/4/26 Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com>

But if not the above, I would let the original code be, i.e. revert the
change.

Then please revert. I like how all people who never touched the file
decide the formatting of this file. Oh and the next time you think one of
my calc changes does not fit your style guide please directly revert. I
don't care anymore.


I just reverted it. Let us stop the discussion here.

Context

What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source? · Christian Lohmaier
- Re: What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source? · Markus Mohrhard
  - Re: What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source? · Tor Lillqvist
    - Re: What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source? · Markus Mohrhard
      - Re: What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source? · Markus Mohrhard
        
        Re: What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source? · Kohei Yoshida
  - Re: What's the point in destroying whitepsace based alignment in the source? · Kohei Yoshida

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.