Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated

Noel Grandin <noel -AT- peralex.com>
Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:20:57 +0200

On 2013-04-05 23:44, Michael Stahl wrote:

so i spent the day trying to understand soffice bootstrap and moving the
proposed Python unit tests in-process to see if that makes this more
acceptable for people.

I consider this acceptable.
So you can consider my objection to python unit tests withdrawn :-)

Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html

Context

claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · Michael Stahl
- Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · Noel Grandin
- Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · Tom Tromey
  - Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · David Malcolm
  - Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · Michael Meeks
    - Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · d . ostrovsky
    - Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · David Malcolm
      - Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · David Ostrovsky
        
        Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · David Malcolm
        
        Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · David Ostrovsky
        
        Re: claims of python unit test un-debugability considered somewhat exaggerated · Tom Tromey

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.