On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 05:58 -0800, julien2412 [via Document Foundation
Mail Archive] wrote:
Caolán McNamara wrote
So, unless Rafael has other plans, it looks to me that you can
remove the bContainsDate lines, the aDT = lines, and the
getPropertyValue(..)
>>= aDT block.
I don't know if you received some information from Raphael but if we
remove aDT variable, does it also mean this whole block can be
removed?
147 if ( bHasTargetURL &&
148 INetURLObject( aContentURL
).GetProtocol() == INET_PROT_VND_SUN_STAR_HIER )
149 {
150 ucbhelper::Content aCnt( aTargetURL,
m_xCmdEnv, comphelper::getProcessComponentContext() );
151
152 try
153 {
154
aCnt.getPropertyValue("DateModified") >>= aDT;
155 }
156 catch (...)
157 {}
158 }
or does the call to Content constructor initialize something that I
missed
I heard nothing from Rafael and as far as I can see the whole block can
go, i.e. the ucbhelper::Content ctor has no side effects.
C.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cppcheck-bContainsDate-not-read-in-templateremoteview-cxx-sfx2-tp4032416p4040331.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.