Re: using backtrace() in exception throwing?

On 2013-02-18 15:39, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> This could be very useful ('catch throw' is so cumbersome in gdb), but 
> I think the first thing to check is if it would actually work. Last 
> time I checked, "recent" features like -fvisibility make backtrace() 
> very often generate call traces that are next to useless. If it turns 
> out the data actually is useful, then also - you can't simply modify 
> the Exception base class, because it's part of the URE, so it should 
> stay binary compatible. It'd need to be stored in the message (which 
> is a question if it's a good or bad idea) or some other way would need 
> to be found. - it'd be good to know how fast/slow the function is. 
> Exceptions generally aren't very fast, but if the function was called 
> every time in the ctor, then depending on fast it is that might make 
> it debug-build-only feature. 

Thanks for the feedback.

I'll have a go at it and report back.

Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html