Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi

Background: I'm looking at bug reports, and the messages are generally only
marginally useful, because I generally have no idea where the original
exception was actually thrown from.
Sometimes the message in the exception will narrow it down a little, but
that still often leaves a lot of likely places, and often the information
I'm really interested in, is a few frames worth of callng stack information.

What would be the costs of calling backtrace()
   http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Backtraces.html
in the exception base class, storing a few frames worth of data,
and then modifying the exception printing code to call
  backtrace_symbols()
when writing out the exception?

For me personally, this would really speed up tracking down the source of
bugs.

Regards, Noel Grandin

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.