RE: patch removing Labels.xcu out of configuration

Hi Winfried,

On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 08:43 +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> I get an exception (warn:legacy.osl:24509:1:unotools/source/config/configitem.cxx:58:
> Exception from GetNodeNames:     *['Avery A4']) which can well be the cause of not
> being able to overwrite existing labels.

        Sounds good :-) that config node should no longer exist I suppose.

> It'll probably cost me some time to find my way in the maze of
> templates/constructs/etc., but I won''t give up easily.

        :-)

> Also, I found some small spelling errors in labels.xml (possibly my
> errors, or there from long ago) and an incomplete comment. I will
> patch these together with the overwrite-patch I hope to make.

        Lovely.

> BTW, should it be possible to overwrite exisiting label definitions
> at all? I mean, shouldn't it be necessary to at least change the
> type name? The existing label definitions are for real labels
> and overwriting them could lead to confusing. Or is this
> purely the user's responsibilty?

        Good point; possibly it just makes no sense - and we should prompt the
user to enter a new manufacturer / name as/when they try to do this
anyway :-)

        Thanks for the fixing & scrutiny !

        All the best,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot