On 02/15/2013 07:27 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
there is needless complexity added to gbuild by having all those "creative"
library naming schemes. One of them is UNOLIBS_OOO which is just like OOOLIBS,
except that they are named a bit different: libfoo.uno.so instead of
libfoolo.so. On dmake/build.pl and esp. with a dmake/build.pl/gbuild mix such a
change would have been needlessly painful because of the many places, were such
a name would show up.
The sourpuss that I am can't help but point out that that "lib" prefix
is a concession to the idiosyncrasies of the linker, and has no place in
libraries that nobody links against. But if it helps... ;)
Stephan
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.