Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

there is needless complexity added to gbuild by having all those "creative"
library naming schemes. One of them is UNOLIBS_OOO which is just like OOOLIBS,
except that they are named a bit different: libfoo.uno.so instead of
libfoolo.so. On dmake/build.pl and esp. with a dmake/build.pl/gbuild mix such a
change would have been needlessly painful because of the many places, were such
a name would show up.

I propose we kill of this needless separation, here is a start (with some more
rationale in the commit msg):

 http://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/2169/

which also serves as a sample. As you see, its relatively simple by now -- the
only additional bookkeeping is in scp2.

If there is no violet opposition to this, I would push this to master and
create a EasyHack to kill of the other UNOLIBS_OOO too.

Any objections? Speak up now or be silent ;)

Best,

Bjoern

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.