Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:02:45PM +0000, Noel Power wrote:
On 14/01/13 13:16, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Noel,

On Monday, 2013-01-14 12:49:42 +0000, Noel Power wrote:
[...]
   ^^^^^
I meant to write 4-0-1 there..
somehow I read it as that
pushed to 4.0, further reviews needed for 4-0-0
Well, thanks, but, hum.. We don't have a 4-0-0 branch yet, so being on
4-0 now means it will land in 4.0.0 anyhow ...
gah you are right ( seems I am too used to 3.6 )
 maybe we should at least
have the late feature consense in hindsight?
yes, Petr, Kendy what's the chances for this, should we wait a day
or 2 or just revert now

I'd not bother to revert unless that works. Incidentially, I would
be against introduding a feature in 4.0.1, but would be OK with doing
it before 4.0.0 ;-)

(Especially as I already updated 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662798 assuming the
ACKs were on IRC or something... )

Regards,

Rene

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.