Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
Hmm, why do you disagree? If done with symlinks, it would keep
Hi,
because I don't know symlinks ...
My concern is that if we arrange the "real" path structure of in a new
way someone else will come with some plausible reasons to rearrange it
in a new third way and so on.
But If we could get some kind of "Table of Contents" what contains al
necessary info (Tinderbox, Pull time, OS, Branch, ...), can be sorted,
searched and may be even configured for personal needs that would be a
good solution.
Best regards
Rainer
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.