Re: [API] Some more cleanup ideas

On Thursday 29 of November 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
> also iirc LLVM/clang has no option similar to -fno-enfore-eh-specs, i.e.
> it always enforces exception specifications, so if we were to use that
> for product builds (no i am not proposing that :) ), we'd need to not
> generate the throw in cppumaker or use some macro to nerf it...

 AFAIK Clang is now the official compiler for MacOSX and *BSD, so I guess 
sooner or later there will be product builds built with it.

 That said, if it really makes a difference, I haven't look at the source, but 
I expect implementing -fno-enforce-eh-specs in Clang should be no big deal.

-- 
 Lubos Lunak
 l.lunak@suse.cz